
How do you assess a skill when the tool keeps changing?
Review cycles, and what “current” has to mean for a qualification in a field that moves faster than its assessment.
In development. Building toward recognition as a UK awarding organisation.
AI Qualifications and Quality Assurance

Anyone can get an answer. We assess whether you can explain it, verify it and stand behind it.

AI Qualifications and Quality Assurance
Anyone can get an answer. We assess whether you can explain it, verify it and stand behind it.
Learners will be expected to explain their process, verify results and remain accountable for their own work.
Say what you asked, why you asked it that way, and what you did with what came back.
Check the claim against something real before it leaves your hands.
The work carries your name. Accountability does not transfer to the tool.
Assessed by a human at every level. Criteria references are indicative while the specification is in development.
Three planned levels, each building practical competence and accountable AI practice.
Level 1
An introduction to safe, informed and responsible use of everyday AI tools.
Level 2
Confident, applied use of AI in workplace communication, research and service.
Level 3
Evaluation and governance of AI within business functions and projects.
Different goals, different timing. Explore what’s possible for you.
Build your verified AI capability from the ground up.
Build an accessible record of verified AI capability, from essential literacy to specialist practice.
Nothing to enrol in yet
Check back soon for learner qualifications.
Deliver qualifications with confidence and quality.
Deliver AIQQA qualifications once the delivery model has been tested.
Nothing to apply for yet
Application opportunities coming soon.
Make better hiring and development decisions.
Understand what a candidate’s AI evidence actually means when recruiting and developing talent.
Vision
A trusted AI qualifications and skills infrastructure: a system in which a learner can build an accessible record of verified AI capability, an employer can understand what that evidence means, and the public can rely on transparent, human-accountable assessment.
Build credibility and dependable operations before we scale.

Build credibility and dependable operations before we scale.
Value responsible human oversight of AI use, not output alone.
Use structured industry input without letting any partner control standards.
Create accessible entry points and a clear route toward specialist practice.
Ground decisions and public statements in evidence, not hype.
Design review cycles that keep pace with a fast-moving field.
We will publish our thinking as the specification develops, rather than after it is finished.

Review cycles, and what “current” has to mean for a qualification in a field that moves faster than its assessment.
Employers can help shape our qualifications now, through structured input, ahead of any formal launch. We also welcome interest from AI practitioners, educators and prospective delivery partners.
Employers can also ask to join the AI Industry Advisory Council.